Sample brief: Should we open a second site?
Updated 20 July 2026
This is a complete worked Executive Decision Brief for a common business decision — opening a second site. It shows what Cerno hands you: a clear recommendation, the vote with dissent on the record, risk and confidence scores, the facts separated from the assumptions, and dated next actions.
Cerno is a private AI boardroom that runs consequential decisions through a structured process — advisor challenge, a recorded vote, risk and confidence scores — and returns a brief like the one below. This example is illustrative; your own would use your numbers.
Proceed on a staged basis — sign a short lease with a break clause, run a small demand test in the target area, and hire the site lead before committing to fit-out.
How this brief was reached
Several advisors formed independent positions first, a Devil's Advocate challenged the leading view, and the advisors voted — with the dissent kept on the record rather than smoothed over. The Chairperson then synthesised the recommendation, scored risk and confidence, and separated what's known from what's assumed. The 3–2 vote and the mid-high risk score are the honest signal: this is a conditional yes, not a confident one.
The frameworks behind it
This decision leans on a pre-mortem (what would make the second site fail?) and reference-class forecasting (how do comparable expansions actually turn out?). It's also close to a one-way door — hence the emphasis on a break clause and a staged commitment.
Weighing an expansion? Put your version through the boardroom and get a brief like this with your own numbers.
Run this decision in CernoFrequently asked
Is this a real company's decision?
No. It's an illustrative, anonymised example of what a Cerno Executive Decision Brief looks like for an expansion decision. Your own brief would reflect your specific numbers and context.